Dynamic approach
Most facilities managers know the pattern. A building runs normally for days, then a small change in load, weather or occupancy pushes plant outside its usual operating range. Minor faults start to appear, routine tasks slip and the team spends the day dealing with whatever needs attention first. When this happens across several buildings at once, a rigid, site-based model may reach its limit.
THE PRESSURE POINTS IN CONVENTIONAL, SITE-BASED FM
Load rarely spreads evenly across an estate. One site may see minimal activity, while a building nearby deals with several failures in a morning. A site-based engineer cannot shift to absorb that pressure, which leaves the facilities manager balancing rising risk on one site against under-used resource on another.
Faults also cut across disciplines. An electrical issue inside a cooling unit or a water quality alert caused by reduced flow each require different skills. If the fault isn’t in the site engineer’s skill set, it cannot be progressed until a specialist arrives. And the delay causes smaller issues to develop into system problems.
Reactive peaks add to this strain. Weather extremes, irregular occupancy and unplanned plant behaviour can take over a site team’s schedule within hours. Planned tasks slide and small defects are logged but not resolved.
Subcontractors might fill the gaps, but this often introduces delay and fragmentation. Attendance depends on their availability and competing priorities. Reporting formats differ and asset history becomes split across several systems. That fragmentation makes patterns harder to detect, which lengthens future diagnostics and limits the ability to intervene early.
WHAT AGILITY LOOKS LIKE IN AN ENGINEERING SERVICE
An agile engineering service relies on engineers working across multiple sites rather than being tied permanently to one. The mobile pool holds a range of disciplines, so most faults can be progressed without waiting for external help. This gives schedulers options that a fixed model doesn’t. When a building comes under pressure, engineers can be redirected without leaving other sites short.
Agility also depends on how work is organised. Dynamic scheduling replaces fixed weekly routes. When BMS data shows a rising return temperature on a heating circuit, a pattern of short cycling on a rooftop unit or a persistent flow imbalance, the scheduler can send the right engineer without waiting for the next planned visit. This prevents deterioration that would otherwise appear as a failure days later.
Mobile teams support planned maintenance as well. Smaller buildings that don’t justify resident engineers still carry statutory tasks. Mobile services allow those tasks to be completed consistently across a dispersed estate. When planned visits reveal developing issues, the same team can pick up the remedial work quickly instead of pushing it into a contractor queue.
THE LINK BETWEEN MOBILE ENGINEERING AND PROACTIVE WORK
Condition-led maintenance depends on timely action. BMS and IoT devices generate reliable signals, but those signals only improve outcomes when they trigger targeted investigation. A mobile engineer can attend early to assess factors such as low flow, temperature drift, excessive run hours or noise that indicates mechanical stress. Intervening at this stage reduces failures and lowers the strain on plant that’s already running under varying loads.
Reactive work still matters of course. Quick attendance prevents faults from spreading to related systems and keeps a building operational until a full repair can be arranged. The advantage of a mobile team is that it can absorb these demands without derailing compliance or planned tasks elsewhere. The scheduler has more options and can triage work more accurately because the skills are already within the team.
WHERE AGILITY CHANGES OUTCOMES
Operational examples make the point clear. A heating circuit that sits slightly outside its expected temperature range for multiple days can lead to wider outage if left unattended. A condensate blockage on a rooftop unit is easy to overlook but can trigger multiple failures in cold conditions. A water hygiene alert may point to a mechanical restriction that a mobile engineer can identify at the first visit. Such issues are common, and their outcomes depend on how quickly specialist resource can reach them.
For facilities managers, the value of an agile, responsive mobile service lies in stability as much as it does in speed. Buildings now operate under more variable conditions, and engineering models need to match that variability. When skills, scheduling and asset data are aligned, mobile services help maintain control. It is a model that matches the way buildings now operate.
Matt Hellicar, Executive Director Customer Solutions, Platinum FM on how technology can help build a more dynamic engineering service
The post Dynamic approach appeared first on FMJ.